Jane Yolen has written over 300 books, won numerous awards, and been given six honorary doctorates in literature. A poet, a fairy tale teller, a writer of fiction across genres and for all ages, Jane has been called the Hans Christian Andersen of America and the Aesop of the twentieth century. Some of her best known books are the Caldecott Award winner Owl Moon, the National Jewish Book Award Winner The Devil’s Arithmetic, and the beloved How Do Dinosaurs… picture books. Jane is also well known for teaching writing to young people and adults. She honored me by writing an essay about crafting distinct voices for my book Writing Young Adult Fiction For Dummies, and today she shares insights regarding the revising process with all of us.
Jane’s interview follows the Rafflecopter form/entry link for today’s “Free Partial Edit by The Editor” Giveaway. Scroll down for her full interview.
As prolific as you are, will you work on multiple WIPs in a single day or do you prefer to stay in one fictional realm per day? I work on multiple things as well as on my students’ pieces/revisions. I find that such literary multitasking keeps me on my toes and keeps me from getting stale.
Would your ideal writing day begin with original drafting or with revision? Why? It all depends on 1) deadline, 2) a revision request sailing in from an editor, and 3) what else is on my plate at the time.
For novels, how many drafts does it typically take before you feel confident about the character and story choices you made? I am not a planner and plotter, so my novels come together in the latter stages of revisions. But they feel fresher to me for that. I call it “flying into the mist.” Others call it pantser (seat of the pants) writing, which has a pejorative and hectoring tone to me.
How much revising typically happens after you involve your editor? Depends on the editors. I had one who told me my novel needed nothing. And I said, every piece of writing needs something. She said, “Take out the exclamation marks.” Since I hate them in formal writing (though not to friends!!!) I went through the novel again. Made a number of small but important revisions and took out the one exclamation point. Most editors are much more hands-on.
Can you share an experience of having a story problem you didn’t think you could solve but eventually did? I had an historical novel called The Gift of Sarah Barker, which takes place during three days in the 1840s in a Shaker community. In the end, I thought I was going to have the young woman, Sarah, and her new husband, Abel (Shakers are not supposed to marry but be as sexless as angels), going out into the world. He was to join the Union Army and be killed. She would take their new little daughter and go—as her mother did with her—to live again with the Shakers. But when I got to the end, I loved Sarah (who was smart and sassy) and Able (who was kind and giving) too much to have that be their (un)happy ending. And while the editor loved the book, she questioned why it took place in three days. As I tried to explain it to her face-to-face in a meeting, I suddenly realized that I—as a fairy tale teller—was trying to impose the Rule of Three on a historical novel. And when I told her that, she smiled enigmatically and said, “You must trust your audience. They will reward that trust by following you wherever you go.” It ended up one of the most satisfying re-writing experiences I have ever had in a novel AND simply made the book work.
You’ve said, “If I ever write the perfect book, I’ll stop writing.” With perfection off the table, how do you know when you’re looking at your best and final draft? Geeze—I wish I had someone who could tell me that! Sometimes an editor simply takes it out of my hands.
Thank you, Jane!
You can follow Jane on Facebook and Twitter @JaneYolen.
Congratulations to Agatha Rodi, winner of yesterday’s Free Partial Edit by the Editor giveaway! (I’ll send you an email, Agatha.)
THANK YOU! I am at a loss of words!! I feel so lucky!!!Efxaristo poli!!! I am Super Excited!!
I’m looking forward to working with you, Agatha.
It’s always fun to get a glimpse into other writers’ and artists’ creative paths. Thanks for sharing!
I agree. I love seeing photos of their writing spaces, too. (But I bet they clean them up for the photos.)
I think my sons would say you’ve already written the perfect book, Jane. They both loved How Do Dinosaurs Say Goodnight!. I’ve read it so many times that even now, probably 8 years since I last had to read it to them, I still remember every word.
I love it when that happens with a child! It’s a good book to fall in love with 🙂
Thank you, Jane, for allowing us a peak into your writing process.
What an opportunity! Pick me! Pick me! 🙂
Thank you for sharing your writing process with us. I find it hard not to think “Rule of Three” when writing.
Owl Moon is one of my favorite books. Thanks for sharing your writing talent with readers.
Thank you, Jane! This is wonderful insight!
I have not read The Gift of Sarah Barker; it’s now on my reading list. Thanks for sharing us today.
Fascinating notes! Thank you so much.
I love Jane’s comment about “flying into the mist.” I think I’ll use that one myself when people ask about my writing process.
I agree: Great way to think of that experience/process.
Love the ‘Flying in the mist’ SO much better than pantser! Also love that sometimes a work is done when an editor takes it out of her hands! Thank you Jane and thank you Deborah! I love revision week!
Jane is the crowned authority in my book. Thanks for sharing your process with us.
Wow, 300 books to her credit. And she’s not a plotter. There’s hope for me yet! 🙂
I’m a huge fan of Jane Yolen. I agree that the term panster has a negative connotation. From now on I’ll explain that I’m “flying through the mist.”
I’m intrigued that you work on multiple WIP in a single day–literary multitasking at its finest!
Thanks for Revision Week! I appreciate Jane’s interview and her challenge with The Gift of Sarah Barker. Now, I need to read it!
Adopting “flying into the mist” at once as my modus operandi.
It’s good to know perfection is hard to achieve. Jane comes pretty darn close though. Thanks for the great interview.
Great interview. It’s so nice to hear that even seasoned writers have to polish and polish! Inspiring. 🙂
Thanks for sharing your process with us Jane!
Now that we’re jettisoning ‘pantser’ for ‘flying into the mist,’ we’ll have to come up with an alternative for ‘plotter.’ Somehow ‘flying into O’Hare’ doesn’t quite cut it.
And no question about critique groups? (I have a suspicion though that it would be 4 for 4 with your writers flying solo except for their helpful editors.)
Jane is a favorite author and editor. So happy to hear more from her!
I have long admired Jane’s work. How wonderful that she has contributed to Revision week.
Ms Yolen sounds like a fun person. And WOW . . . she’s incredibly creative . . . talk about multi-tasking. Truly amazing!
I just adore Jane Yolen’s work!
I now have a mental picture of flying into the mist and loving the feeling of adventure and excitement. Not only are Jane’s books golden so are her words on writing and revising. I’d always thought it might muddy characters to work on two novels at once, but I’m ready to try it since I’ve got two revisions that have stalled. Thanks to both of you for this post.
Another great post! Love Jane’s openenss.
Somehow, from having read Jane’s work for many years and having met her at a couple of SCBWI functions, I had a feeling those would be her answers! 🙂 Oh to be as brilliant and prolific as she is. I also want to put in a plug for her short story collection called “Twelve Impossible Things Before Breakfast.” I think that is my favorite book of hers!
The best of the best! Thanks so much for featuring, Jane, DEAR EDITOR!
It’s good to know that an “ideal writing day ” means “flying into the mist” to even schedule it! Thanks for the wonderful insights, Jane, and many thanks for your wonderful books from a grateful children’s librarian (insert exclamation marks here)
Thanks for featuring the wise and prolific Jane Yolen! And how enticing to think of the revision process as “flying into the mist.”
I love the exclamation mark story! So impressed that there was only one in the novel and that it could be deleted!!
“Flying into the mist.” i LOVE that!
I met Jane Yolan at an SCBWI Conference. She gave a wonderful session.
Thanks to Jane for sharing all these insights. I look forward to reading The Gift of Sarah Barker!
So happy you interviewed Jane Yolen! I have always wondered how she is able to be so prolific. Thanks!
I understand the “never finished” concept. I’d go back and cut words from my published picture book, if I had the chance. Ha!
Lovely story about the Shaker book! Thank you for sharing!
I enjoyed getting a glimpse into Jane’s process. Thank you for this interview!
I love “flying into the mist.” Pantser has always bothered me. Such a frat-boys kind of word.
I’m off to find Sarah Barker.
I adore Owl Moon. In fact, our copy is tattered from having read it over the years to four kids. Thank you, Jane, for sharing your writing process and describing it in such a lovely way!
Great peek into the process of a wonderful writer, one I’ve heard is exceptionally kind and generous with her time and expertise.
“Flying into the mist.” I love that!
I always rush to the library when a new Jane Yolen book comes out… though I see I missed one (The Gift of Sarah Barker). How did that happen?!?!? [exclamation points are for Jane in case she needs a new supply].
Thank you for sharing another great post, Deborah and Jane! Much mist in my past, and future. 🙂
Love you Jane and your works! Just thought you’d like to know..
Oh, I absolutely love your books, Jane. Thank you for being a part of this Revision Week.
Totally love “flying into the mist.”
Thank you for your down-to-earth answers!